Skip to main content

Press Center

MEDIA ADVISORY:


JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE TO HOLD EMPLOYMENT HEARING ON RELEASE OF NEW MARCH JOBS REPORT
 
JEC to Address New Jobs Report from Bureau of Labor Statistics in Light of Further Deterioration of Economy and Likely Recession


Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer and Representative Carolyn Maloney, Chairman and Vice-Chair of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) respectively, will hold a hearing on the newly released Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) monthly employment figures with Commissioner Keith Hall on Friday, April 4, 2008 at 9:30 am in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 106.  Representative Baron Hill (D-IN) will preside over the hearing, entitled “The Employment Situation in March 2008.”  In the wake of continued declines in home prices and intensifying credit crisis spreading from Wall Street to Main Street, Dr. Hall will assess recent developments within the labor market.


          WHAT:    Joint Economic Committee Hearing on “The Employment Situation in March 2008”
          WHO:      Dr. Keith Hall, Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics              
          WHEN:    Friday, 9:30 a.m., April 4, 2008
          WHERE:  Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 106


The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.
www.jec.senate.gov
#    #    #

SCHUMER ON FALLING HOME PRICES AND CONSUMER CONFIDENCE

 

Today new economic indicators show that the U.S. economy is continuing to falter and not only are home prices still sinking, but consumer confidence is following suit.  The S&P/Case-Shiller index reported the biggest drop in home prices, 11.4 percent in January, since the index was created in 1987, and continuing 19 consecutive months of home price declines.  Virtually no major metropolitan area was left unscathed according to the Case-Shiller analysis for January.  The Conference Board's measure of consumer confidence fell much more than expected as well, going down double digits from February to March. 

 

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee reacted with the following statement about today's weak economic news:

 

"Newfound weakness in consumer confidence is partially the result of 19 months of falling home prices in nearly every single corner of the United States .  For the last year, the President and his Republican allies in Congress have chosen a hands-off, Hoover-like posture towards this housing crisis.  It is long passed time for Washington to act.  Democrats in the Senate will have a modest and targeted housing recovery bill on the floor next week and we hope the White House will work with us to pass it quickly. 

 

“We hope President Bush stops whistling a happy tune about this economy while homeowners and consumers across the country are singing the blues."

 

Sen. Schumer will be holding a JEC hearing with Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, on April 2 - details can be found at www.jec.senate.gov.

 

The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.

 

www.jec.senate.gov

#  #  #

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
ON FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE IRAQ WAR,
SCHUMER & MALONEY CALL ON PRESIDENT BUSH TO ACCOUNT FOR PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC AND BUDGET COSTS
 
Joint Economic Committee Leadership Urges the President to Send Administration Official to Testify at Upcoming Hearing
 
President’s Belittling of Economic Experts’ Estimates of War Costs Should Increase Burden of Administration to Fully Disclose Tremendous War Costs
 
Washington, D.C. – Today, the fifth anniversary of the start of the war in Iraq, Senator Charles E. Schumer and Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Chairman and Vice-Chair of the Joint Economic Committee respectively, sent a letter to President Bush urging him to give a full account of the total costs of the war.  Schumer and Maloney called for a productive debate over the economic impact of the war; and they asked the President to make a member of his administration available in the coming weeks to testify at a hearing of the Joint Economic Committee to provide Congress and the American people with a “better understanding of the current and future budgetary and economic costs of the war in Iraq.”
 
Referencing the President’s comments today on the “exaggerated estimates of the costs of this war” and claim that “war critics can no longer credibly argue that we are losing in Iraq, so now they argue the war costs too much,” Schumer and Maloney cited the administration’s initial estimates, between $50 and $100 billion, and failure of the administration to offer a full accounting of the war costs to our budget and economy. 
 
A copy of the letter appears below:
 
March 19, 2008
 
President George W. Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
 
Dear Mr. President:
 
Today, on the fifth anniversary of the start of the war in Iraq, we recognize the tremendous efforts of our troops and we are grateful for their service to our country and the sacrifices they and their families have made. Despite our troops’ best efforts in Iraq, there is little progress in setting up an independent government, there is no plan to redeploy our troops, and there has been no indication by your administration of the future commitment and costs to our nation. The American people deserve a full accounting of what the war has cost in terms of lives, our reputation abroad, and our economy; and they especially deserve to know the future costs of your Administration’s preferred Iraq strategy going forward.
 
Today, you marked the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war by deriding the "exaggerated estimates of the costs of this war," and suggesting that "war critics can no longer credibly argue that we are losing in Iraq, so now they argue the war costs too much.”  Your administration’s initial estimates before the war began were between $50 and $100 billion, far less than the actual or projected costs thus far.  To date, there has been no accounting by your administration of the wars costs to our budget and economy. 
Last year, the Joint Economic Committee prepared a report showing that if your Administration's 2008 funding request is approved, the full economic cost of the war will total $1.3 trillion just by the end of the year. This figure includes the “hidden costs” of deficit financing, the future care of our wounded veterans, and disruption in oil markets. And if the war continues, the costs will only mount higher. In his new book, Professor Joseph Stiglitz estimates that the total economic price tag for the war could reach $3 trillion to $5 trillion over the next decade if we remain in Iraq. That is above and beyond what we've already spent on the war, and it is money that will continue to be diverted from important national priorities.
Your administration has questioned the patriotism and intellectual integrity of those providing war cost estimates.  We can have a debate about the legitimate costs of this war, and there may be disagreements, but no one’s patriotism or integrity should be maligned. A productive debate over the long-term economic impact of the war and its cost to future generations is long overdue.
 
We have respectfully written to your Office of Management and Budget Director, Jim Nussle, to provide our committee with the Administration’s costs estimates for the war, but have not received a response.  We are urging you to make a member of your administration available in the coming weeks to testify at a hearing of the Joint Economic Committee to provide the Congress and the public a better understanding of the current and future budgetary and economic costs of the war in Iraq. 
 
Sincerely,
 
Senator Charles E. Schumer                                          
Chairman                                                                            
Joint Economic Committee     
 
 
 
Representative Carolyn B. Maloney  
Vice-Chair
Joint Economic Committee
 
The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.
#          #          #

SCHUMER ON THE IRAQ WAR'S 5th ANNIVERSARY
AND ITS BACKBREAKING COSTS

 

On the fifth anniversary of the Iraq War, U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, released the following statement praising the troops and questioning the enormous costs of the war to our budget and overall economy:

 
"On the fifth anniversary of the start of the Iraq War, this Administration still has no clear exit strategy for our troops, no path to political reconciliation, and no accounting of the costs to our budget or economy.
 
"Despite the good work of our troops, the American people are baffled by the lack of political progress. The case against the war in Iraq has been building for a long time. Too many young American men and women have given their lives, or have suffered terrible, life-altering injuries, with little to show for their sacrifice.
 
"And now, Americans are trying to comprehend the eye-popping dollar figures that this war is costing our budget and our economy. The tremendous cost of this war to families, the federal budget, and the whole economy has become the $800 billion issue the administration refuses to talk about. 
 
"For the amount the Bush Administration wants to spend PER DAY in Iraq, over $430 million we could: put an additional 8,900 police officers on the streets per year; provide health insurance for 329,200 low-income children through CHIP per year; hire another 10,700 Border patrol agents per year; make college more affordable for 163,700 students through Pell Grants per year; and help nearly 260,000 American families to keep their homes with foreclosure prevention counseling this year." - Sen. Charles E. Schumer
 
The Joint Economic Committee issued a report on the costs of the war in Iraq last November and also held the first hearing of 2008 into the economic costs of the Iraq War in February.  You can find the witness testimonies, statements, webcast, and charts by linking to the JEC Hearing on Iraq War Costs.
 
The Joint Economic Committee Cost of War Report (11/2007) also reveals estimates for the war's hidden costs.  The JEC's economic cost estimates were dwarfed by a recent book from Nobel Laureate, Professor Joseph Stiglitz, who testified at our hearing last month.  His book, "The Three Trillion Dollar War," estimates that budgetary costs alone could be up to $3 trillion and larger economic costs could reach $5 trillion.
 

 The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.
www.jec.senate.gov

MEDIA ADVISORY:

FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIRMAN BERNANKE TO TESTIFY AT JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE ON THE U.S. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

 JEC Hearing Will Be Fed Chair’s First Congressional Testimony Since March FOMC Meeting and Recent Decision to Inject $200 Billion into Credit Markets
 
Schumer Invited Bernanke for His Views on Looming Recession, Spreading Credit and Housing Crisis, Declining Dollar, and Overall U.S. Economic Health
 
 
Washington, D.C.U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC), will hold a hearing on the Economic Outlook for the United States with Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Ben Bernanke, on April 2, 2008 at 9:30 am in  Room 106  of the Dirksen Senate Office Building.  Chairman Bernanke will provide his first Congressional testimony following the March Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting and recent announcement that the Fed will inject $200 billion into the credit market.  While a key question is whether the U.S. is already in a recession or heading into one, the JEC will explore additional measures to address this serious financial crisis.   
 
            WHAT:     Joint Economic Committee Hearing on “The Economic Outlook”
            WHO:       The Honorable Ben Bernanke
                              Chairman, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
            WHEN:    9:30 a.m., Wednesday, April 2, 2008
            WHERE: 106 Dirksen Senate Office Building
 
The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.

FLOOR STATEMENT OF SEN. CHARLES E. SCHUMER
Chairman, Joint Economic Committee
Humphrey Hawkins Budget Debate
March 11, 2008

Mr. President, today we are looking at an economy on the verge of a recession. The economic hits to middle class American families just keep on coming. Before I talk about the Democratic budget package, which is far superior to thePresident’s budget, I’d like to use this Humphrey Hawkins Act debate time, as the Chair of the Joint Economic Committee, to talk about the economy. In the last week alone, we have learned:

We are experiencing record home foreclosures in the subprime and the prime mortgage markets from coast to coast. Every single state has been affected by an increase in foreclosures, according to an analysis by the Joint Economic Committee.

 Home prices in every major market are falling, and families have historically low equity in their homes. Moody’s Economy.com estimates that 8.8 million homeowners—over 10% of all homeowners—by the end of this month – will owe more money than their homes are worth.

 Just this past Friday, the Labor Department reported back to back months of job losses, with serious losses this past month in the manufacturing, construction, and retail sectors.

 • Today the Commerce Department released data showing rising trade deficits with China and oil-producing nations like Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia.

 • Americans are paying a record average of $3.22 per gallon of gas today.

 

 • And if that isn’t enough, oil is selling for over $110 per barrel – an all-time record.

 • As we put forward a more sensible budget plan for our country this year, we have to recognize the pressure on families has been made worse since President Bush took office. Over the last seven years, Americans have been squeezed by skyrocketing energy, health care and education costs:

 • Energy costs have ballooned 64.0 percent during Bush’s tenure.

 

 A gallon of regular grade gasoline has increased almost 60 percent in real terms, up from $1.62 in January 2001. The average middle-class family is paying more JUST IN HIGHER GASOLINE PRICES than they received in Bush tax cuts.

 There are 7.2 million more people uninsured since Bush took office in 2001, and the average cost of health insurance for families who do have it has increased nearly 40 percent since 2000.

 Inflation-adjusted tuition for four-year public colleges increased 36.3 percent between the 1999-2000 and 2005-2006 school years to $5,526 per year.

 • In February 2008, 4.9 million people were working part-time for economic reasons but wanted full-time work, and the UNDER-employment rate is almost 9 percent, up 1.6 percentage points since 2001.

 • That’s 1.4 million fewer people with jobs since Bush took office.

 

 The bottom line is that this administration is the owner of the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover, and the last two months of losing nearly 90,000 jobs secures that unfortunate place in history.

 The significant jobs losses in the manufacturing and construction sectors have continued since the housing market has been in trouble and doesn't seem to be getting better.

 • It isn’t a surprise to many economic experts that we are on the brink of recession oralready in one – although the administration has done an excellent job of hiding its head in the sand.

 • And the job losses in the retail sector are particularly troubling because it indicates that consumer spending, which has driven this economy, has alsodeclined measurably.

The president’s ‘hear no evil, see no evil’ policies on our economy simply do not work.

It is only a matter of time before consecutive months of job losses, falling home prices, rising energy prices, and cutbacks in consumer spending lead us to a fullblown recession. It is crystal clear to everyone, but the Bush Administration, that we are inevitably heading towards a recession.

 

 

For the last seven years we have been governed by a one-size-fits-all economic strategy guided solely by massive tax cuts. That strategy has produced burgeoning budget deficits, a serious global trade imbalance, and has brought us to the precipice of a recession.

This unmistakable economic downturn began early last year as the subprime mortgage mess unfolded. The spillover effects into the broader housing market, the credit markets, and the overall economy are tremendous.

According to the JEC’s conservative estimates, by 2009 at least 1.3 million foreclosures will occur as the riskiest subprime mortgages (the two- and three-year adjustable rate mortgages) reset over the course of this year and next. This will lead to the destruction of approximately $100 billion in housing wealth, including an estimated $71 billion in direct losses on foreclosed properties and a decline in the value of neighboring properties by an additional $32 billion.

And overall housing prices continue to fall, as seen in the almost 10 percent decline of the S&P/Case-Shiller national home price index since the first quarter of 2006.

Last week, the Federal Reserve released data showing that American families hold less equity in their houses than at any time since the Fed began tracking this data in 1945. Under the Bush Administration, the primary source of wealth for most Americans – the equity in their houses – dropped by nearly 10 percentage points, from a 57.8 percent equity stake when Bush took office to a current low of 47.9 percent.

Given that housing wealth totaled about $23 trillion in 2006, the decline in household balance sheets is now between one and two trillion dollars. Declines in house prices are likely to have significant negative effects on consumer spending and a host of other deleterious effects on the economy.

We are borrowing to pay for this war in Iraq as well. The economic cost of the Iraq War is truly staggering. According to Professor Joe Stiglitz, who testified at the JEC last month, the war could cost $3 Trillion, that TRILLION with a “T.” According to a report our committee did in November, the war will cost nearly $37,000 per household.

The federal government is increasingly reliant on the rest of the world to buy our public debt, and with a falling dollar and skyrocketing debt, who knows how much longer we can count on such financial largess from our trading partners.

President Bush turned huge budget surpluses into huge deficits in a few short years. In January 2001, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that from 2002 to 2011, those surpluses would total $5.6 trillion. In 2001, CBO’s projection was for a surplus of $573 billion in 2007. In reality, the deficit was $163 billion. That’s a turnaround of $736 billion, or more than $100 billion for every year that President Bush has been in office.

This remarkable turnaround in the budget picture shows a reckless disregard by the administration for living within our means and has frankly jeopardized the future economic success of families across the country.

He may have passed some big tax cuts for his well-off friends, but he has not been very compassionate to future generations, who will be paying the interest on this increased debt for generations to come.

The Democratic budget provides some measure of sanity and order to our budget priorities, and hopefully will put our country back on more solid economic footing.

I want to commend Senator Conrad for crafting a budget resolution that gets us started on the road to recovery from these misguided policies. There is much work to do, but we are off to a good start with this budget resolution.

One of the important things about Senator Conrad’s budget is that by restraining spending and making the right choices on long-term tax cuts, it provides room for important middle-class tax cuts to ease the middle-class squeeze, such as the tax cuts provided for in Senator Baucus’s amendment. These tax cuts are not a fix for what ails our economy in the long term, but they will help middle-class families make ends meet.

Senator Baucus’s amendment is broad-based tax relief targeted to the middle class, plain and simple. Everyone benefits, but the middle class gets most of the benefit. That’s how we ought to be providing tax relief in this country – not providing more and more tax breaks to the top one-tenth of one percent, whose incomes have shot into the stratosphere. Tax cuts for those that need them, not for those that won’t notice them.

If we look at the tax cuts that passed in 2001, we know which ones should be made permanent, and which ones shouldn’t. The $1,000 per child tax credit, marriage penalty relief, and the 10 percent bracket are all sensible tax cuts that can be made permanent with the surpluses provided for in the Conrad budget.

The Baucus amendment does some other sensible things as well. Across the country, parents are struggling to manage the crunch of work and family. According to a report issued by the JEC, full-time child care costs average about $7,300 per year in the United States, almost 20 percent of the median income of families with young children. The Baucus amendment will permanently extend the tax credit for child care expenses, again providing essential benefits for working families.

Senator Baucus’s amendment also includes provisions to offset the impact of rising local property taxes, an issue that I hear about from my constituents every week. And the amendment will make permanent the important military tax benefits that passed both the House and Senate last December. These benefits are particularly targeted towards our servicemen and women and their families. Given the multiple rotations many of our servicemen and women have endured, these tax relief provisions are supported by all and they are the least we can do.

I urge my colleagues to support the budget, and to support the Baucus amendment when it is offered. Mr. President, I yield the floor.

 

 

SCHUMER ON JOBS REPORT: "HOW MANY WAKE UP CALLS DOES HIS ADMINISTRATION NEED?"


In response to the Labor Department's jobs report today, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, released the following statement:

“How many wake-up calls does this administration need -- foreclosures yesterday, jobs today?  The president’s ‘hear no evil, see no evil’ policies on our economy simply do not work."

"The bottom line is that this administration is the owner of the worst jobs record since Herbert Hoover, and the last two months of losing nearly 90,000 jobs secures that unfortunate place in history.  The significant jobs losses in the manufacturing and construction sectors have continued since the housing market has been in trouble and doesn't seem to be getting better.  But the job losses in the retail sector are particularly troubling because it indicates that consumer spending, which has driven this economy, has also declined measurably."

“It is only a matter of time before consecutive months of job losses, falling home prices, rising energy prices, and cutbacks in consumer spending lead us to a full-blown recession.  It is crystal clear to everyone but the Bush Administration that we are inevitably heading towards a recession and today's dismal jobs report is just another warning sign that Washington needs to do much more to help our economy than it’s done so far."

The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.
www.jec.senate.gov

SCHUMER RELEASES NEW JEC ANALYSIS OF MBA
 FORECLOSURE DATA
 
Washington, D.C. – Today Sen. Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC), released a state-by-state analysis showing that subprime mortgages in foreclosure have increased from the third to the fourth quarter last year in EVERY state, and prime mortgages in foreclosure have increased in all but two states (Montana and South Dakota).  The JEC analysis of the Mortgage Banker's Association record-setting foreclosure data in the fourth quarter of 2007 is attached and can be found here:  New State by State Foreclosure Analysis.
 
"Foreclosures are spreading from one end of the nation to the other and from the subprime to the prime mortgage markets.” Schumer said.  “The record number of foreclosures from coast to coast demands quick action from Washington.  Unless the administration and its Republican allies in Congress drop their opposition to a meaningful housing stimulus bill, this foreclosure and housing crisis will only get worse and property values will continue to deteriorate." 
 
 The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.
JEC REPORT FINDS FORTUNE 100 COMPANIES OVERWHELMINGLY OFFER 6-8 WEEKS OF PAID FAMILY LEAVE
 
Maloney: Our Most Profitable Companies are a Model for a Basic Paid Leave Standard, but Not the Gold Standard
 
Washington, D.C. – The Joint Economic Committee today released a report, requested by Vice Chair Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY), finding that three-quarters of Fortune 100 companies offer mothers some form of paid leave when they have a new child, typically lasting six to eight weeks. Family leave has become an increasingly important workplace policy because most families no longer have a stay-at-home parent to provide care for a new child and they often cannot afford to take unpaid leave.  As a guide for policymakers, the Joint Economic Committee examined how firms design their paid family leave policies by asking Fortune 100 companies about the length of paid leave that they provide for new parents.
 
“Fortune 100 companies' policies should offer a model for implementing paid family leave as a basic employment standard for all workers in our nation,” said Vice Chair Maloney. “Both Ozzie and Harriet go to work now. Families need time to care for a new child and businesses need these policies to attract and retain valuable workers. Our most profitable companies are providing a basic standard for their workers, but it’s still not the gold standard found in other industrialized countries.”
 
Senator Charles E. Schumer, Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, said, “In a world where two parents working is the norm, we need to do more to make sure moms and dads are given the time they need to care for their families. There's nothing more wonderful than having children, and nothing more demanding.  Paid family leave policies ensure that parents can fully enjoy and tend to their growing families without having to worry about their next paycheck."
 
Key findings from the JEC report, Paid Family Leave at Fortune 100 Companies: A Basic Standard, But Still Not the Gold Standard:
   Three-quarters (73.6 percent) of the Fortune 100 companies that responded offer mothers a specific paid parental leave program – such as paid family or disability leave – for the birth of a child, typically lasting six to eight weeks.
   Fathers are less likely to be offered family leave, have access to fewer weeks of paid leave, and generally use paid sick days for their leave. One-third (32.1%) of the companies report that they offer fathers paid parental leave and among those offering paid leave, the length is typically only 2 weeks. 
   Nine-out-of-ten (88.7%) of the Fortune 100 firms that responded offer parents some form of paid leave when they have a new child.  Many workers must cobble together leave from various programs: family leave policies, pregnancy-related disability leave, and the allowable use of paid sick days. When combining paid leave from all available sources, Fortune 100 companies typically offer mothers 12 weeks of paid leave and fathers six weeks of paid leave.
   A significant share of Fortune 100 companies (39.6%) provide employees with both paid (including leave policies, pregnancy-related disability leave, and the allowable use of paid sick days) and unpaid leave for the birth of a child.  Employees in these firms typically have a total of 6 months (26 weeks) of unpaid, job-protected parental leave, on top of any paid leave they have access to.
   Roughly ten percent (11.4%) of the companies reported offering employees no paid leave of any kind.
-    While Fortune 100 companies offer more leave than typically provided by other U.S. companies, the length of leave remains far below that offered in the European Union and nearly all other advanced economies.

Workers need a new set of workplace policies that allow them to meet the competing demands of work and family, the report concludes. The U.S. is the only industrialized country that does not ensure paid family leave for all workers. Fortune 100 companies' policies offer a model for implementing paid family leave in the U.S. These firms offer a basic set of leave policies which, while not as generous as in Europe, are consistent with the lengths of leave being proposed in the states and offered by Congressional offices.

Fortune 100 firms overwhelmingly offer paid leave to new mothers, in addition to paid sick days, according to the report. Employees need sick days in case they or their children get sick. Further, like the FMLA, paid family leave should allow both mothers and fathers similar lengths of time to care for and bond with a new child. While mothers need more time to recover physically from the rigors of childbirth and to breastfeed, fathers are also needed at home to help care for the new child.

 
 
 The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.

MEDIA ADVISORY:

JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE TO HOLD EMPLOYMENT HEARING ON RELEASE OF NEW FEBRUARY JOBS REPORT

With Unemployment on the Rise, JEC to Address Newly Released Jobs Figures from BLS and Examine the Growing Problem of Long-Term Unemployment

Maloney and Schumer to Explore Benefits of Unemployment Insurance with BLS Commissioner

Washington, D.C.U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer and Representative Carolyn Maloney, Chairman and Vice-Chair of the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) respectively, will hold a hearing on the newly released Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) monthly employment figures with Commissioner Keith Hall on Friday, March 7, 2008 at 9:30 am in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 628. The hearing, entitled “The Employment Situation: February 2008” will address the new jobs report to be released that morning. The new jobs report examines the change in national unemployment rates and non-farm payroll employment figures over the past month. The hearing’s second panel will focus on the long-term unemployed and unemployment insurance benefits. As more Americans struggle economically, with job growth stalling and wages falling, the committee will analyze the latest developments in the labor market, the best barometer of our nation’s economic health.

WHAT: JEC Hearing: “The Employment Situation: February 2008”
WHO:   Panel 1: Dr. Keith Hall, Commissioner, Bureau of Labor Statistics
            Panel 2: Dr. Rebecca Blank, Professor of Economics at the University of Michigan
Robert V. Kerr Visiting Fellow at The Brookings Institution
Christine Owens, Executive Director, National Employment Law Project
Dr. Lowell Gallaway, Distinguished Economics Professor, Ohio University
WHEN:  9:30 a.m., Friday, March 7, 2008
WHERE: Dirksen Senate Office Building, Room 628

    The Joint Economic Committee, established under the Employment Act of 1946, was created by Congress to review economic conditions and to analyze the effectiveness of economic policy.

    www.jec.senate.gov